Critics concerning modular development in ArgoUML.
The current version of ArgoUML has the following critics
in this category.
Classifier not in Namespace of its Association
One of the well-formedness rules in UML 1.4 for
associations, is that all the classifiers attached to the
ends of the association should belong to the same namespace
as the association.
If this were not the case, there would be no naming, by
which each end could refer to all the others.
This critic is triggered when an association does not
meet this criterion. The solution is to delete the
association, and recreate it on a diagram, whose namespace
includes those of all the attached classifiers.
In the current implementation of ArgoUML this critic
does not handle hierarchical namespaces. As a consequence
it will trigger for associations where the immediate
namespaces of the attached classifiers is different, even
though they are part of the same namespace hierarchy.
Add Elements to Package <package>
Suggestion that the specified package has no content.
Good design suggests packages are created to put things
This will always trigger when you first create a
package, since you cannot create one that is not